remember
Ricordo di Piero Boni
L'unità sindacale, l'"erga omnes", the defense of the individual, not as a union member but as an employee. The guidelines of a man of simple ideas and strong passions Monday, February 8, 2010
Mens Earrings Onyx Studs
Umberto Romagnoli
Our last meeting was in early December 2008, during a meeting can not remember which birthday celebration of the SPI-CGIL. The meeting was warmer than usual, because they were the conditions that occurred that made it possible to refine our similarities and to make us feel closer: Piero knew that too, now, I was about to enter the category of pensioners. To say that the setting in which the meeting took place could not be more appropriate to the municipality status.
We met through Gino Giugni, One evening in the summer of '62 near the Rome headquarters dell'Intersind during the negotiations, of which Peter was a hero, to renew the contract of Iri-engineering that would have ended with the recognition of the principle of structured bargaining. Subsequently, there have been numerous opportunities to attend: the school of Ariccia, a congress of the CGIL, at conferences organized by the Foundation and designed by Piero presided, and among these, the one in Recanati, where he held the commemorative re-enactment of James Brodolini to coincide with the twentieth anniversary of his death.
Yes, Peter was looking for me often and thinking of our relationship, I realize now that it was especially him to establish the nature and stylistic. The motivation was not only the personal sympathy - as another spontaneous sudden - but also the determination with which Piero attributed to the existence of a relationship methodological value of a general nature. As she wrote in the preface of a notebook of the Foundation, was in favor of the practice of meetings between scientists and men of action, because "they need each other and their comparison may succeed useful and fruitful." The climate of which took advantage of our decades-long relationship and where it had its roots was the fact that just a cultural-political association that could develop and flourish on the basis of a disinterested intellectual esteem. It Piero honored me and I never stopped to reciprocate. In the current lexicon
came from that time an idiomatic expression, referring to him, he loses the flavor of banal cliches: Piero Boni was the leading member of a race with extinction, and indeed unionists so do not be born more. Without simple ideas and passions strong trade union militancy would orphan base. But he would not even charismatic leaders. As Piero Boni.
Convinced that the division into symbols of the union movement was the daughter of the Cold War that most of the internal logic of the movement, one of his strongest passions - more forti delle dure repliche dell’esperienza – aveva per oggetto l’unità sindacale. Un giorno mi disse che, in materia, bisognava assumere come modello il comportamento dei generali francesi dopo Sedan. Anche loro avevano un’idea semplice e una passione forte: riprendersi l’Alsazia e la Lorena. Ci pensavano sempre, ma non ne parlavano mai. Un po’ per non essere sopraffatti dall’amarezza del pathos suscitato dallo struggimento per la perdita di quei territori e un po’ perché sapevano che il sogno non si sarebbe realizzato se non preparandone le condizioni di fattibilità con la discrezione che occorre per destreggiarsi in casi difficili. Nel nostro caso, la principale difficoltà era rappresentata dal cambiamento sign of the traditional link between trade union and political party which, result in the subordination of the first-second, a serious obstacle to collective autonomy. E 'especially in defense of the latter that Piero was an honest, tireless preacher trade union unity.
not less tenacious was his predilection for the promised article erga omnes. 39 of Cost.ituzione. Piero expressed frequently - and continued to do so when, over time, he realized to opt for a solution that seemed the most out of fashion - he was convinced that the lack of erga omnes collective agreement did suffer the common law The only viable as a lame duck. In this regard, Peter shared the view of the founding fathers and especially Vittorio Foa, which must be a definition of union that equates to "a subject of a public function, arm or segment of the state, while remaining a free subject of self-defense in a sphere of private law. "
Neither Peter nor have ever Victor wrote that the bipolarity of the union is symmetrical to the dual nature of the collective agreement. But both had a conception of normativity of the collective agreement (national figure who was then the clearly dominant at the time of the Constituent Assembly as fascism inherited from legal), a concept that makes a product consensus, which is a self-command, and also the product of an authority in the balance between public and private, which is a hetero-command.
According to this view, widely held even in the legal culture, the contract is similar to a huge water tank that can transform potential energy into kinetic energy of the reservoir and to get electricity in all homes. Otherwise, other than oneself: the users remain in the dark and to be light, must make do with oil lamps, where the supply of electricity is a service by which modern society can not do without. As if to say that Piero judged a priority the need to protect the rights of the individual with respect, rather than its capacity (which is only possible) to join a union, to the recipient of the effects of industrial action.
course, not unaware that, with regard to the union, the dispute on the implementation of Article. 39 was not originated by excuses. The season of the state-owner father had closed recently and the trade union movement for democracy had just risen well to tenersene away, because he deserved a chance - he was so poor experience of freedom - to build his own. Was right to require the State to non-written rule double track - non-interference and non-indifference - which is la precondizione in assenza della quale l’antica massima ubi societas ibi ius significa soltanto che la società non può fare a meno del diritto. Essa infatti può anche significare che la società produce diritto e che la giuridicità non costituisce più un’emanazione della sovranità statuale.
Ciononostante, Piero era impensierito dalla “discrasia tutta italiana fra costituzione formale e costituzione materiale” nella stessa misura in cui lo rendeva pensoso ogni scostamento dai principi di una sana democrazia: nel mondo occidentale, scriveva nel 1998, “non esiste una situazione come la nostra” e, a cinquant’anni di distanza, “è legittimo interrogarsi se non sia The time has come for the union to find better placed in the institutional framework. "
true to himself, Peter has kept his confidence with the unshakable confidence of someone who knows what it depended on its authenticity.
(09/13/2009
Source: Equality and Freedom
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment